Designing and Specifying: ASTM A53 vs. ASTM A500

Posted by on in Architecture
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 9871
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

If you have ever referred to the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) standard documents used for steel design and construction, you’ll notice that ASTM A53 steel pipe designations are different than ASTM A500 round hollow structural sections and they are manufactured to meet different standards. While ASTM A500 is available in cross-sections matching each of the cross-sections for ASTM A53steel pipe, there are many more cross-sections available in A500.

In this blog, I will outline the differences between A500 structural hollow sections and A53  pipe and discuss why  ASTM A500 is the better choice.

ASTM A53 Pipe

ASTM A53 pipe, a standard specification for black and hot-dipped, zinc-coated, welded and seamless  steel pipe, is used for mechanical and pressure applications as well as ordinary uses in steam, water, gas and air lines. ASTM A53 can be formed and welded. Pipe sizes are properly designated using the Nominal Pipe Size (NPS).  This is the nominal pipe diameter with a scheduled wall thickness (i.e., 4 inch Schedule 40 pipe).

ASTM A500 Round

ASTM A500 is a standard specification for cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in round, square and rectangular shapes. ASTM A500 is the most common specification in North America for Hollow Structural Sections.  Round HSS sections are properly designated by indicating the outside diameter in decimal inches by the nominal wall thickness to three decimal places (i.e., 5.563 x 0.250).   

Why A500?

Since ASTM A500 is a structural specification, round HSS produced to this specification are fit for purpose when used for structural applications and general construction use.  ASTM A53 is a pipe specification and is intended to be used in mechanical and pressure applications.

The specified yield strength of A500 Grade C (the most commonly available grade) is 46 ksi.  The specified yield strength of A53 Grade B is 35 ksi.  That’s over a 30% increase in yield strength.  Therefore, A500 round HSS have greater strength-to-weight ratios than A53 pipes. So, with round HSS you need less steel, by weight, to do the job—less weight equals less cost.

The tolerances of A500 are tighter than those of A53, therefore the A500 round HSS have a higher degree of quality and less variability.

Round HSS have a superior surface finish and do not come with the lacquer coating that typically comes on A53 pipe.  This saves money and time as this lacquer coating needs to be removed from the A53 pipe to accommodate welding and painting.

A53 pipe are only available in standard pipe sizes.  Round HSS come in a variety of sizes and wall thicknesses.  Just take a look at the 14th edition of the AISC Steel Construction Manual and see how many pages of round HSS there are versus the number for A53 Pipe.

Lastly, the ASTM A53 Specification requires testing (i.e., pressure testing) that is not needed for structural applications.  This additional testing can add unnecessary additional cost.

ASTM A500 applications include structural supports, building columns, highway signs, oil field services and communication towers, to name a few. All steel structures have their pros and cons, but ultimately ASTM A500 is the better choice when you need a round profile. 

Architects, fabricators, structural engineers and contractors: I encourage you to read up on ASTM A500 and visit The Steel Tube Institute’s website, which offers a wide variety of technical publications, load tables and design aids.

Please feel free to contact me at bradlee.fletcher@atlastube.com and I will work to answer your questions about ASTM A500 round HSS.

0
Brad Fletcher, S.E., serves as a Sales Engineer for Atlas Tube, providing technical expertise on the use of Hollow Structural Sections (HSS) and Pipe Piling products to design engineers, detailers, fabricators and architects. A registered structural engineer, Brad has two decades of experience, having held senior positions at leading architecture and engineering firms including Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and Halvorson & Partners. Brad holds both Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Civil Engineering from Purdue University. He is active in many industry groups including the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), the Structural Engineers Association of Illinois and ASTM International.

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, October 25, 2014

Atlas Observer Archive

Quick Links

Contact us at
800-733-5683
usa-flag-icon
800-265-6912canada customer service

Sales and Customer Service Contacts